Marcel Proust wrote a big book called "In Search of Lost Time”. After reading the first section, “Combray,” I developed different feelings about how he wrote it. First I need to mention that I really like how he describes things and uses fancy words. It makes the story feel artistic and interesting. The way he tells the story, like sharing the thoughts and feelings directly from the main character's mind, is also something I appreciate. This style lets me understand what characters are thinking and feeling more deeply, making the story special.
Proust's long sentences in his writing are both liked and founded complicated. I admire the usage of fancy language and appreciate the detailed observations and careful expressions in the novel. Proust's rich language makes the novel special, forming a woven picture of words that shows how complicated life can be. However, this style with its complicated sentences might be hard for me to understand since I'm used to simpler stories.
I like how Proust pays close attention to small details when he writes. I think he's good at using words to create clear and detailed pictures, making the story more interesting and letting me feel like I'm part of it. Some parts of the story that go off track and talk about other things are praised for being deep and thoughtful. However, at the same time, I don't always like them because I think these parts can make the story more confusing. Proust explores different ideas and spends time thinking about things, adding a deep meaning to the story. While some readers like thinking about these ideas, I sometimes wish the story was simpler and more straightforward. I really like how Proust lets us hear what the characters are thinking in their minds. This makes the story feel real, and I can connect with the characters on a personal level. The characters' thoughts show how complicated human emotions and relationships can be, making the story more authentic. Even though the story doesn't follow a regular plot, "In Search of Lost Time" is praised for its unique way of telling the story. Some people think Proust's different approach is groundbreaking and cool. However, it also makes things tricky for me since I'm used to stories with a clear beginning, middle, and end. Thus, I have different opinions on how easy it is to understand and enjoy the book.
In conclusion, what I think about the way "In Search of Lost Time" is written varies a lot. I love its creativity, language skills, and deep emotions, but sometimes I struggle with its complexity and going off-topic. The book shows that everyone has their own view on literature, and I can explore Proust's writing in my own way.
My discussion question: After reading "Combray," reflect on Proust's complex and detailed description, how does his meticulous attention to detail enhance or hinder your reading experience? Do you find his writing style immersive, or does it present a challenge?
Comments